So, Les Misérables. But first a disclaimer. As some of you already know, I have a bit of background in vocal performance. Les Miz is my favorite musical, and I’ve seen it live twice. So that’s the perspective from which I write. (Side note: I started writing this waaaaay back in December, when we saw the movie, and I’m just now getting around to posting it.) Now that you’ve been fairly warned… [Read more…]
Today I had the opportunity to teach a priesthood lesson on adversity. It was interesting to see the lesson take an unusual turn.
LDS theology says adversity comes to an individual’s life for any of a number of reasons:
- Our exercise of agency (our freedom to choose): we exercised poor judgment or just flat-out sinned, and so we reap what we sowed.
- UPDATE: Failed to mention one pertinent comment from yesterday: sometimes adversity comes from righteous exercise of agency, such as those who face persecution due to their obedience, or who choose a good but difficult path (i.e. one who elects to work towards a university degree, therefore implicitly signing up for the temporal difficulties of college).
- Another’s exercise of agency: they exercised poor judgment or just flat-out sinned, so we suffer the consequences of another’s choices.
- We live in a fallen world: it rains and everybody gets wet (except in Texas right now), so some of us end up with some awful ailment or condition of some kind.
There are probably other fine distinctions that I’ve missed, but that pretty much covers it. I think this is pretty much in agreement with the wider Christian community. But there’s an additional reason that is found in LDS scripture. I hadn’t planned on really hitting it too hard, but it as it arose as a topic of discussion in class, I went with it. And that additional reason is this: sometimes, the Lord intentionally imposes adversity upon His children to help them to grow. Consider Mosiah 3:19:
For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father. (emphasis added)
Some raised the notion that the Lord sometimes allows us to endure the consequences of our poor behavior so that we learn good from evil. True enough, but that’s not what’s being suggested here. It’s one thing for a parent to allow a child to hurt due to poor judgment; it’s another thing entirely to suggest that the Lord would deliberately place adversity in that child’s life – to “inflict upon him” discomfort, suffering, even pain.
But I was reminded of some amazing YouTube videos I found recently.
Since the lesson had migrated to this discussion of the Lord intentionally giving us adversity, I showed this to the class on the iPad (gotta say: that thing has got to be a game changer for classroom instruction). I made a point of skipping to 2:05 to show the lady tossing the baby in the water. Does little Rene look or sound to you like he’s having a good time? But lest you think of this as child abuse, consider that, given enough time and training, the kids can do this:
I found these links, with others, on this Metafilter post. Read the comments for some comedy gold. As I pointed out to the class, these videos suggest that parents of toddlers have the following options when it comes to their children’s safety around swimming pools:
- Hover over their children nonstop to make sure they aren’t at risk of drowning
- Tether them to a cinderblock to make sure they get nowhere near the pool (yes, I shamelessly stole this from a Metafilter comment)
- Teach them to swim to give them the skills to be safe
If you choose door #3, you’re almost certainly electing something that can be unpleasant and downright frightening for your child, and for you. But it could result in something that will be a blessing to that child’s life. LDS theology suggests that God can operate much the same way in our spiritual lives. As it happens, C.S. Lewis agreed. From Mere Christianity:
The command Be ye perfect is not idealistic gas. Nor is it a command to do the impossible. He is going to make us into creatures that can obey that command. He said (in the Bible) that we were ‘gods’ and He is going to make good His words. If we let Him – for we can prevent Him, if we choose – He will make the feeblest and filthiest of us into a god or goddess, a dazzling, radiant, immortal creature, pulsating all through with such energy and joy and wisdom and love as we cannot now imagine, a bright stainless mirror which reflects back to God perfectly (though, of course, on a smaller scale) His own boundless power and delight and goodness. The process will be long and in parts very painful; but that is what we are in for. Nothing less. He meant what He said. (boldface added)
The world abounds with examples that progress only comes through discomfort and trial. The best grapes come from vines that are a little bit stressed out. Every non-juiced bodybuilder will tell you that great strength is achieved only through tremendous effort and pain. The strongest steel is produced only from intense heat. And the most righteous, Godlike people around are those purified and strengthened by the fire of adversity. And because He is looking to produce the very best, sometimes God sparks that fire deliberately. I hadn’t planned to go there during the lesson because, well, it’s just a very uncomfortable teaching, but it’s true nonetheless.
One final thought. I read a quote on Times and Seasons a while back that I can’t find, but has always stuck with me: “Study of adversity tends to weaken faith. Experience of adversity tends to strengthen it.” Maybe they posted it with attribution to somebody. Whatever – it’s just very, very true.
Dovetailing beautifully off my prior post on social media and Google, Danny Sullivan delivers a fantastic report on how Google and Bing are incorporating Facebook and Twitter linkage into their search results. The closing graphs say it all:
In the end, it’s clear that Twitter data especially plays a role in web search, these days. Who you are is being understood. Are you a trusted authority or not? If there’s PageRank for pages, both search engines have a form of TwitterRank for people.
Meanwhile, retweets serve as a new form a link building. Get your page mentioned in tweets by authoritative people, and that can help your ranking in regular search results, to a degree.
If you want to get traction online, social media engagement is mandatory, not optional.
You may have heard of the case of Brian Aitken, who was sentenced to seven years in prison in New Jersey for transporting guns he had legally acquired as a Colorado resident while relocating to the Garden State. (Yes, you read that right – he’s doing seven years for moving his own guns to his own residence.) As you might imagine, this has sparked more than a bit of outrage in many corners, and there is a Facebook group devoted to his release. The Philadelphia Daily News has picked up the story, and while there’s nothing really new there, this howler caught my attention:
“What little I can glean about the transportation issue leaves me puzzled, but a person with common sense would not be moving illegal products from one place to another by car,” said Bryan Miller, executive director of CeaseFire NJ, an organization devoted to reducing gun violence.
Mr. Miller. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that he really hadn’t been moving, as testified by his mother, his friend and the arresting officer. He still needs to move said firearms and related items to his home. So how precisely would you suggest he transport them? A U-Haul truck, I’m guessing? Armored vehicle, perhaps? Gee, how about a caravan of law enforcement to accompany him, lest he be consumed by his primal urges and prompted to go on a homicide spree? I mean, really – do you have any idea how profoundly stupid you sound?
“If Mr. Aitken did the research he said he did, he would not have hollow-point bullets and large-capacity magazines in the vehicle,” Miller said. “They are illegal, period.”
If anybody has failed to do his research, it would be Miller. As indicated in Radley Balko’s excellent article (the first link above):
In December 2008 Aitken made a final trip back to Colorado to collect the last of his possessions, including the three handguns he had legally purchased in Colorado—transactions that required him to pass a federal background check. Aitken and his friend Michael Torries had found an apartment in Hoboken, and Torries accompanied Aitken to Colorado to help with the last leg of the move. According to testimony Torries later gave at Aitken’s trial, before leaving Colorado Aitken researched and printed out New Jersey and federal gun laws to be sure he moved his firearms legally. Richard Gilbert, Aitken’s trial attorney, says Aitken also called the New Jersey State Police to get advice on how to legally transport his guns, although Burlington County Superior Court Judge James Morley didn’t allow testimony about that phone call at Aitken’s trial.
This guy did everything he could to make sure he was legally within the bounds of the law. He took great pains to transport his legally acquired firearms as required by state and federal law. Yet he still ends up sentenced to prison. And Miller suggests that, in spite of all his efforts to follow the letter and spirit of the law, he had it coming?
Given recent SCOTUS rulings, I’m actually quite optimistic on the long-term odds of the survival of the Second Amendment, at least at the federal level. The real battleground moving forward is at the state and local level. And if this case is any indication, the next target should be New Jersey. Any state with such insane gun laws should be easy pickings in court. Here’s hoping this case has gotten the attention of somebody at IJ.